2012 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,997 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (253 HP) has 95 more horse power than 2008 Rover 75. (158 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 2008 Rover 75.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (288 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (215 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Chevrolet Captiva | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Captiva | 75 |
Year Released | 2012 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2997 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 288 Nm | 215 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.6 seconds | 9.6 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4673 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1849 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1756 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2707 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 65 L |