2012 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Chevrolet Equinox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Chevrolet Equinox would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2013 Honda CR-Z. (120 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda CR-Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 541 kg more than 2013 Honda CR-Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda CR-Z. (174 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda CR-Z. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 2013 Honda CR-Z has manual transmission. 2013 Honda CR-Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Chevrolet Equinox | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
| Model | Equinox | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 233 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1737 kg | 1196 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1842 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2858 mm | 2435 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.4 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 40 L |
