2012 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1992 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (340 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Chevrolet Malibu | 1992 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Malibu | Tempo |
Year Released | 2012 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4872 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1786 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2852 mm | 2540 mm |