2012 Chevrolet Silverado vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Fisker Karma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Fisker Karma would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 298 kg more than 2011 Fisker Karma.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Chevrolet Silverado | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Fisker |
| Model | Silverado | Karma |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 323 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2838 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6337 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2032 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1965 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4018 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 136 L | 36 L |
