2012 Citroen C-Crosser vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Holden Epica would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2011 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Epica.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Citroen | Holden |
| Model | C-Crosser | Epica |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2179 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
