2012 Citroen C-Crosser vs. 2013 Acura ILX
To start off, 2013 Acura ILX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Citroen C-Crosser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Citroen C-Crosser would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2013 Acura ILX. (148 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2013 Acura ILX.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Acura ILX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Acura ILX (233 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser. (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2013 Acura ILX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Citroen C-Crosser | 2013 Acura ILX | |
Make | Citroen | Acura |
Model | C-Crosser | ILX |
Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 8 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 99 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |