2012 Citroen C-Zero vs. 2005 Volvo V50
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Zero is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volvo V50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volvo V50 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo V50 weights approximately 399 kg more than 2012 Citroen C-Zero.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Zero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Citroen C-Zero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Citroen C-Zero | 2005 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | C-Zero | V50 |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Single Speed | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1479 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3395 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1475 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2800 mm |
