2012 Citroen C1 vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Citroen C1 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden Colorado would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C1. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C1.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C1. (93 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Citroen C1 | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Citroen | Holden |
| Model | C1 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
