2012 Daewoo Matiz vs. 2011 BMW 520
To start off, 2012 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 BMW 520 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 BMW 520 (182 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. (50 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 BMW 520 weights approximately 939 kg more than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 BMW 520 (270 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2011 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. 2011 BMW 520 has automatic transmission and 2012 Daewoo Matiz has manual transmission. 2012 Daewoo Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 BMW 520 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Daewoo Matiz | 2011 BMW 520 | |
| Make | Daewoo | BMW |
| Model | Matiz | 520 |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 794 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 50 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 69 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 90.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 84 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 144 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 17 seconds | 8.4 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 851 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4907 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1462 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2968 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 70 L |
