2012 Dodge Charger vs. 2001 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2012 Dodge Charger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Charger (292 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2001 Ford Mustang. (260 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Charger weights approximately 333 kg more than 2001 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Mustang (407 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Dodge Charger. (352 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Dodge Charger | 2001 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Charger | Mustang |
Year Released | 2012 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 6350 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 352 Nm | 407 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | 8-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1813 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5077 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1905 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1483 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3053 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 59 L |