2012 Dodge Charger vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Dodge Charger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Holden Epica would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Charger (292 HP) has 144 more horse power than 2008 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Epica.
Because 2012 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Charger (352 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2012 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Dodge Charger | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Charger | Epica |
Year Released | 2012 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 352 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | 8-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5077 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1905 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1483 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3053 mm | 2700 mm |