2012 Dodge Charger vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Dodge Charger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden UTE would be higher. Both 2012 Dodge Charger and 2010 Holden UTE are equipped with a 3,600 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Charger (292 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2010 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Charger (352 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 2012 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE. 2012 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Dodge Charger | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Charger | UTE |
Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 352 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | 5-speed shiftable automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |