2012 Dodge Charger vs. 2010 Toyota Venza
To start off, 2012 Dodge Charger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Toyota Venza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Toyota Venza would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Charger (292 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Venza. (269 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Venza.
Because 2012 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Venza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Charger (352 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Toyota Venza. (334 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2012 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Toyota Venza.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Dodge Charger | 2010 Toyota Venza | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Charger | Venza |
Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3456 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 6350 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 352 Nm | 334 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | 8-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5077 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1905 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1483 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3053 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.6 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 67 L |