2012 Dodge Charger vs. 2013 GMC Yukon

To start off, 2013 GMC Yukon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Charger (370 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2013 GMC Yukon. (316 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2013 GMC Yukon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 GMC Yukon weights approximately 713 kg more than 2012 Dodge Charger.

Because 2013 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Charger (535 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 GMC Yukon. (454 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 GMC Yukon.

Compare all specifications:

2012 Dodge Charger 2013 GMC Yukon
Make Dodge GMC
Model Charger Yukon
Year Released 2012 2013
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5700 cc 5300 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 370 HP 316 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 535 Nm 454 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type 5-speed shiftable automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1929 kg 2642 kg
Vehicle Length 5077 mm 5649 mm
Vehicle Width 1905 mm 2009 mm
Vehicle Height 1483 mm 1962 mm
Wheelbase Size 3053 mm 3302 mm
Fuel Consumption 9.4 L/100km 9.5 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 14.7 L/100km 14.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 119 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]