2012 Dodge Durango vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2012 Dodge Durango is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Durango weights approximately 608 kg more than 2003 Ford Ranger.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Dodge Durango. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Dodge Durango | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Durango | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5700 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 360 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2328 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5075 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1925 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1801 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3043 mm | 3010 mm |
