2012 Fisker Karma vs. 2000 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volkswagen Golf. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volkswagen Golf would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1435 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Golf.
Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Fisker Karma | 2000 Volkswagen Golf | |
| Make | Fisker | Volkswagen |
| Model | Karma | Golf |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 113 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Single Speed | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2540 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4996 mm | 4148 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1984 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1331 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2512 mm |
