2012 Fisker Karma vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 810 kg more than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Fisker Karma | 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Fisker | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Karma | CLK |
Year Released | 2012 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 221 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Single Speed | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2540 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4996 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1984 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1331 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 62 L |