2012 Ford E-150 vs. 2009 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2012 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Holden Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Holden Caprice would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2012 Ford E-150. (225 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford E-150.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford E-150 (387 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Caprice. (350 Nm). This means 2012 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Caprice.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Ford E-150 | 2009 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | E-150 | Caprice |
Year Released | 2012 | 2009 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 387 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed automatic | Automatic |