2012 Ford E-150 XL vs. 2012 Ford E-150 XLT
To start off, both 2012 Ford E-150 XL and 2012 Ford E-150 XLT were released in the same year (2012). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. Both 2012 Ford E-150 XL and 2012 Ford E-150 XLT are equipped with a 4,600 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 225 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 387 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Ford E-150 XL | 2012 Ford E-150 XLT | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | E-150 | E-150 |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Van | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 387 Nm | 387 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 4-speed automatic | 4-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2611 kg | 2611 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5504 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2017 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2085 mm | 2085 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3505 mm | 3505 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 14.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 132 L |
