2012 Ford F-150 vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2012 Ford F-150 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-150 (360 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. (143 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1385 kg more than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-150 (515 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. 2012 Ford F-150 has automatic transmission and 2002 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford F-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Ford F-150 | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | F-150 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2012 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 360 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2670 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3670 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 136 L | 60 L |