2012 Ford F-250 vs. 1986 Holden Astra
To start off, 2012 Ford F-250 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Astra would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 315 more horse power than 1986 Holden Astra. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Astra.
Because 2012 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 424 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Astra. (124 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Astra.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Ford F-250 | 1986 Holden Astra | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | F-250 | Astra |
Year Released | 2012 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6200 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 385 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 548 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 6269 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2029 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1966 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3967 mm | 2420 mm |