2012 Ford F-250 vs. 2003 Ford Lynx

To start off, 2012 Ford F-250 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Lynx would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 277 more horse power than 2003 Ford Lynx. (108 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Lynx.

Because 2012 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 403 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Lynx. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Lynx.

Compare all specifications:

2012 Ford F-250 2003 Ford Lynx
Make Ford Ford
Model F-250 Lynx
Year Released 2012 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6200 cc 1595 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 385 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 548 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Flex Fuel Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type 6-speed shiftable automatic Automatic
Vehicle Length 6269 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 2029 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1966 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 3967 mm 2620 mm