2012 Ford F-250 vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Ford F-250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden Epica would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-250 (385 HP) has 232 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Because 2012 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-250 (548 Nm) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2012 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Ford F-250 | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | F-250 | Epica |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6200 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 385 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 548 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 6269 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2029 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1966 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3967 mm | 2700 mm |
