2012 Ford F-350 vs. 1998 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Ford F-350 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-350 (385 HP) has 257 more horse power than 1998 Honda CR-V. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1998 Honda CR-V.
Because 1998 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford F-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-350 (548 Nm) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 2012 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Ford F-350 | 1998 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | F-350 | CR-V |
Year Released | 2012 | 1998 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6200 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 385 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 548 Nm | 180 Nm |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 6269 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2029 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1961 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3967 mm | 2620 mm |