2012 Ford F-350 vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2012 Ford F-350 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-350 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2010 Toyota 4Runner. (270 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota 4Runner.
Because 2010 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford F-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-350 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Toyota 4Runner. (376 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2012 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Ford F-350 | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | F-350 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6200 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 385 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 548 Nm | 376 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 6269 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2029 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1961 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3967 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 87 L |