2012 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Nissan Navara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Nissan Navara would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Ford Falcon | 2010 Nissan Navara | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Falcon | Navara |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3983 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | LPG | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4967 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1868 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1433 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2838 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 80 L |
