2012 Ford Galaxy vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2012 Ford Galaxy is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2012 Ford Galaxy. (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Galaxy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Galaxy weights approximately 360 kg more than 2004 Nissan X-Trail.

Because 2004 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Galaxy. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Galaxy. (170 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2004 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Galaxy.

Compare all specifications:

2012 Ford Galaxy 2004 Nissan X-Trail
Make Ford Nissan
Model Galaxy X-Trail
Year Released 2012 2004
Body Type Minivan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 2488 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 113 HP 177 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 170 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 2300 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1650 kg 1290 kg
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2810 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 60 L