2012 GMC Sierra vs. 2013 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2013 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 GMC Sierra would be higher.
Because 2012 GMC Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 GMC Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Suzuki SX4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2012 GMC Sierra | 2013 Suzuki SX4 | |
Make | GMC | Suzuki |
Model | Sierra | SX4 |
Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 0 HP |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | 4-speed automatic | automatic |