2012 GMC Yukon vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2012 GMC Yukon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 GMC Yukon weights approximately 884 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 GMC Yukon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 GMC Yukon | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | GMC | Ford |
| Model | Yukon | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6200 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 403 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2604 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5649 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2009 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1951 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3302 mm | 3010 mm |
