2012 Holden Barina vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Barina is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden Calais would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Barina. (197 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Barina. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Barina has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Barina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Holden Barina | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Barina | Calais |
Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 197 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |