2012 Holden Calais vs. 1983 Austin Ambassador
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Ambassador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Ambassador would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 195 more horse power than 1983 Austin Ambassador. (83 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Ambassador.
Because 2012 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Ambassador, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Ambassador. (131 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Ambassador.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Holden Calais | 1983 Austin Ambassador | |
| Make | Holden | Austin |
| Model | Calais | Ambassador |
| Year Released | 2012 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 278 HP | 83 HP |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 131 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
