2012 Holden Calais vs. 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,963 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (305 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Holden Calais | 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | Calais | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2012 | 1993 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3963 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 278 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
