2012 Holden Calais vs. 2006 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Volkswagen Golf. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Volkswagen Golf would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 130 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Golf. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Golf.
Because 2012 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen Golf. (200 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen Golf.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Holden Calais | 2006 Volkswagen Golf | |
| Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
| Model | Calais | Golf |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 278 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
