2012 Holden Calais vs. 2008 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 68 more horse power than 2008 Mitsubishi Raider. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2008 Mitsubishi Raider.
Because 2008 Mitsubishi Raider is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Raider will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mitsubishi Raider. (319 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mitsubishi Raider.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Holden Calais | 2008 Mitsubishi Raider | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Calais | Raider |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 278 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 15.8 L/100km |
