2012 Holden Calais vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Rover 75 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 149 more horse power than 2008 Rover 75. (129 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2008 Rover 75.
Because 2012 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (300 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Holden Calais | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Holden | Rover |
Model | Calais | 75 |
Year Released | 2012 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 278 HP | 129 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 300 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |