2012 Holden Colorado vs. 2013 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 200 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Holden Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Holden Colorado would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chrysler 200 (279 HP) has 118 more horse power than 2012 Holden Colorado. (161 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Colorado.
Because 2012 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chrysler 200. (353 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chrysler 200.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Holden Colorado | 2013 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Holden | Chrysler |
Model | Colorado | 200 |
Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 279 HP |
Torque | 360 Nm | 353 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |