2012 Holden Colorado vs. 2013 Volkswagen Eos

To start off, 2013 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Holden Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Holden Colorado would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volkswagen Eos (197 HP) has 74 more horse power than 2012 Holden Colorado. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Colorado.

Because 2012 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volkswagen Eos (281 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Colorado. (207 Nm). This means 2013 Volkswagen Eos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Colorado. 2013 Volkswagen Eos has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Colorado has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Colorado will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Volkswagen Eos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: