2012 Holden Commodore vs. 1998 Volvo C70

To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 198 more horse power than 1998 Volvo C70. (162 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1998 Volvo C70.

Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Volvo C70. (230 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Volvo C70. 1998 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: