2012 Holden Commodore vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden Colorado would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 237 more horse power than 2010 Holden Colorado. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Colorado. (207 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Holden Commodore | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Commodore | Colorado |
Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5976 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 360 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |