2012 Holden Commodore vs. 2013 Honda Civic

To start off, 2013 Honda Civic is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 222 more horse power than 2013 Honda Civic. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda Civic.

Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda Civic. (174 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda Civic. 2013 Honda Civic has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Honda Civic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: