2012 Holden Cruze vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (167 HP) has 57 more horse power than 2012 Holden Cruze. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (228 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze. 2010 Mazda 3 has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Cruze has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Cruze will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Holden Cruze | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Cruze | 3 |
Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 167 HP |
Torque | 153 Nm | 228 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4597 mm | 4506 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1788 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1477 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2685 mm | 2639 mm |