2012 Holden Cruze vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Cadillac CTS-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Cadillac CTS-V would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP) has 446 more horse power than 2012 Holden Cruze. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Because 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Cadillac CTS-V (746 Nm) has 593 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 2011 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Holden Cruze | 2011 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Holden | Cadillac |
Model | Cruze | CTS-V |
Year Released | 2012 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 556 HP |
Torque | 153 Nm | 746 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4597 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1788 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1477 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2685 mm | 2880 mm |