2012 Holden Epica vs. 1985 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1985 Ford Tempo. (90 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford Tempo. 1985 Ford Tempo has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Epica has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Epica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1985 Ford Tempo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Holden Epica | 1985 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | Epica | Tempo |
Year Released | 2012 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 90 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 170 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4805 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2540 mm |