2012 Holden Epica vs. 2011 BMW X3
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 BMW X3 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 BMW X3 (256 HP) has 108 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 2011 BMW X3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 BMW X3 (560 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2011 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Holden Epica | 2011 BMW X3 | |
| Make | Holden | BMW |
| Model | Epica | X3 |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 256 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 560 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4805 mm | 4648 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1881 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1675 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
