2012 Holden Epica vs. 2012 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, both 2012 Holden Epica and 2012 Renault Grand Scenic were released in the same year (2012). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2012 Renault Grand Scenic. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Grand Scenic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Grand Scenic. (300 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Grand Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Holden Epica | 2012 Renault Grand Scenic | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Epica | Grand Scenic |
Year Released | 2012 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 300 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4805 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |