2012 Honda CR-Z vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2012 Honda CR-Z. (122 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda CR-Z.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Honda CR-Z | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Honda | Ford |
Model | CR-Z | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2012 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1500 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4079 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2436 mm | 2490 mm |