2012 Hyundai HED-5 vs. 2013 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-V is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Hyundai HED-5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Hyundai HED-5 would be higher. At 2,354 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Honda CR-V is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Hyundai HED-5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2012 Hyundai HED-5 has manual transmission. 2012 Hyundai HED-5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Hyundai HED-5 | 2013 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Hyundai | Honda |
Model | HED-5 | CR-V |
Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | 5-speed manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |