2012 Hyundai i20 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2012 Hyundai i20 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,931 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2012 Hyundai i20. (99 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2012 Hyundai i20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 232 kg more than 2012 Hyundai i20. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Hyundai i20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Hyundai i20. (137 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Hyundai i20.

Compare all specifications:

2012 Hyundai i20 2004 Ford Mustang
Make Hyundai Ford
Model i20 Mustang
Year Released 2012 2004
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1396 cc 3931 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 99 HP 200 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 137 Nm 310 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 77 mm 100.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75 mm 84.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 17:01 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1155 kg 1387 kg
Vehicle Length 3940 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2525 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 5.4 L/100km 11.2 L/100km


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]