2012 Jaguar XF vs. 1978 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1978 Datsun 280Z. (150 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1978 Datsun 280Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 379 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Datsun 280Z. (221 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Datsun 280Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Jaguar XF | 1978 Datsun 280Z | |
| Make | Jaguar | Datsun |
| Model | XF | 280Z |
| Year Released | 2012 | 1978 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 150 HP |
| Torque | 600 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4961 mm | 4399 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1877 mm | 1631 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2908 mm | 2304 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |
