2012 Jaguar XF vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator
To start off, both 2012 Jaguar XF and 2012 Suzuki Equator were released in the same year (2012). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,953 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2012 Suzuki Equator. (261 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2012 Suzuki Equator.
Because 2012 Suzuki Equator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Suzuki Equator. (381 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Suzuki Equator.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Jaguar XF | 2012 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
Model | XF | Equator |
Year Released | 2012 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 600 Nm | 381 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4961 mm | 5600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1877 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1461 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2908 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 80 L |